Comments on: Testing my new Camera http://iangrey.org/2007/03/13/testing-my-new-camera/ Variety is the spice of life Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:04:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: Shades of Grey » Another new camera http://iangrey.org/2007/03/13/testing-my-new-camera/#comment-3614 Shades of Grey » Another new camera Sun, 27 Apr 2008 17:31:39 +0000 http://iangrey.org/testing-my-new-camera/#comment-3614 [...] Little more than a year ago, I took my Kodak pocket camera out for a stroll and spotted something amusing on the facade of the Numptorium. [...] [...] Little more than a year ago, I took my Kodak pocket camera out for a stroll and spotted something amusing on the facade of the Numptorium. [...]

]]> By: Ian http://iangrey.org/2007/03/13/testing-my-new-camera/#comment-203 Ian Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:45:00 +0000 http://iangrey.org/testing-my-new-camera/#comment-203 Liz, I very nearly called this post Monkey Town Hall and put it on Morleygate blog instead.<br/><br/>However, I enjoyed doing it as humour more than as serios. Liz, I very nearly called this post Monkey Town Hall and put it on Morleygate blog instead.

However, I enjoyed doing it as humour more than as serios.

]]> By: Liz http://iangrey.org/2007/03/13/testing-my-new-camera/#comment-200 Liz Wed, 14 Mar 2007 10:03:00 +0000 http://iangrey.org/testing-my-new-camera/#comment-200 Impressive camera.<br/><br/>It's strange: I read this bit "graced by an entablature of Morley life " as "graced by an entablature of MONKEY life" at first, then corrected myself, then, what do I see but monkeys?! Spooky. Impressive camera.

It’s strange: I read this bit “graced by an entablature of Morley life ” as “graced by an entablature of MONKEY life” at first, then corrected myself, then, what do I see but monkeys?! Spooky.

]]> By: Ian http://iangrey.org/2007/03/13/testing-my-new-camera/#comment-199 Ian Wed, 14 Mar 2007 07:31:00 +0000 http://iangrey.org/testing-my-new-camera/#comment-199 James,<br/><br/>I have just realised that th epictures don't entirely do the camera justice, as I nearly always resize webby images down to my screen resolution (which depends on whether I post from the shed PC or the roving laptop, of course.<br/><br/>I do this as force of habit to keep the file size down, a legacy from the days when 100 Meg limit was a massive website. The original images were roughly 1.2 Meg, the scaled ones about 800k. James,

I have just realised that th epictures don’t entirely do the camera justice, as I nearly always resize webby images down to my screen resolution (which depends on whether I post from the shed PC or the roving laptop, of course.

I do this as force of habit to keep the file size down, a legacy from the days when 100 Meg limit was a massive website. The original images were roughly 1.2 Meg, the scaled ones about 800k.

]]> By: james higham http://iangrey.org/2007/03/13/testing-my-new-camera/#comment-198 james higham Wed, 14 Mar 2007 07:19:00 +0000 http://iangrey.org/testing-my-new-camera/#comment-198 Kodak, yes? Most impressive. Kodak, yes? Most impressive.

]]>