<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taking photos in public</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iangrey.org/2008/03/28/taking-photos-in-public/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iangrey.org/2008/03/28/taking-photos-in-public/</link>
	<description>A riotous colour of life's rich tapestry</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://iangrey.org/2008/03/28/taking-photos-in-public/comment-page-1/#comment-3481</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iangrey.org/2008/03/28/taking-photos-in-public/#comment-3481</guid>
		<description>I didn't know there'd been any problems. Certainly photographing children without parents' permission is a bit dubious. But not necessraily because of the photographer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t know there&#8217;d been any problems. Certainly photographing children without parents&#8217; permission is a bit dubious. But not necessraily because of the photographer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shades</title>
		<link>http://iangrey.org/2008/03/28/taking-photos-in-public/comment-page-1/#comment-3475</link>
		<dc:creator>Shades</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 20:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iangrey.org/2008/03/28/taking-photos-in-public/#comment-3475</guid>
		<description>PCSO Bloggs, welcome. I agree it isn't necessarily the points you say, but it is symptomatic of petty officialdom, particularly those where uniforms go with the job. This certainly isn't a one-off by any means judging by some photography forums I occasionally visit. (The &lt;a href="http://www.samizdata.net/blog/archives/2008/03/if_you_suspect.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Met campaign&lt;/a&gt; hasn't helped either)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PCSO Bloggs, welcome. I agree it isn&#8217;t necessarily the points you say, but it is symptomatic of petty officialdom, particularly those where uniforms go with the job. This certainly isn&#8217;t a one-off by any means judging by some photography forums I occasionally visit. (The <a href="http://www.samizdata.net/blog/archives/2008/03/if_you_suspect.html" rel="nofollow">Met campaign</a> hasn&#8217;t helped either)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PCSO Bloggs</title>
		<link>http://iangrey.org/2008/03/28/taking-photos-in-public/comment-page-1/#comment-3474</link>
		<dc:creator>PCSO Bloggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iangrey.org/2008/03/28/taking-photos-in-public/#comment-3474</guid>
		<description>I don’t think this is necessarily anything to do with Government, Police or PCSOs. It’s just one plum of a PCSO who needs a bit of ‘retraining’. I know for a fact he’s had a ‘word in his ear’ by a senior officer, so let’s leave it there hay?

It’s not a draconian new law or policy, just some numpty PCSO who got it wrong. We are all human; we all get it wrong every now and again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t think this is necessarily anything to do with Government, Police or PCSOs. It’s just one plum of a PCSO who needs a bit of ‘retraining’. I know for a fact he’s had a ‘word in his ear’ by a senior officer, so let’s leave it there hay?</p>
<p>It’s not a draconian new law or policy, just some numpty PCSO who got it wrong. We are all human; we all get it wrong every now and again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
